Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Skumanich v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24699
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Skumanich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEADE v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24700
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MEADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santo v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01331
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siudvinski v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02766
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Siudvinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betty Warner-Williams v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14469
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Betty Warner-Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oporto v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Helen Oporto
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speidel v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14468
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,, Merck & Co, Inc. and MCKESSON CORP.,
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speidel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02762
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reiss v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02765
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leonard Reiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santo v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02764
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
