Cases 21 - 30 of 204
Santo v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01331
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oporto v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Helen Oporto
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vespa v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01932
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vespa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melton v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02758
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
James Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02762
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Preston v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02763
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrea Preston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santo v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02764
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reiss v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02765
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leonard Reiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siudvinski v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02766
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Siudvinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stedman v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02768
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Stedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
