Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Mullis v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
as 6:2007cv01126
Plaintiff:
Ossielee J Mullis
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. Amercable,Inc et al.
as 0:2007cv60497
Plaintiff:
Deborah Thomas and Robert L. Thomas
Defendant:
Amercable,Inc, American Optical Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
City of Crystal River v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00120
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Plaintiff:
City of Crystal River and City of Crystal River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Homosassa Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Homosassa Water District and Homosassa Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Tampa Bay Water v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 8:2007cv00516
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Plaintiff:
Tampa Bay Water and Tampa Bay Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
City of Inverness Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
City of Inverness Water District and City of Inverness Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Redstone et al v. Chevron USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv20751
Plaintiff:
Mara Redstone, Mara Redstone, Mara Redstone and others
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Inc., Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
