Cases 21 - 30 of 311
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. DionTech Consulting, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03014
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
DionTech Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Star Intercom & Construction, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03015
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Star Intercom & Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Roger Scanlon Fine Carpentry, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02739
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Roger Scanlon Fine Carpentry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. TNT Hardwood Floors L.L.C.
as 1:2011cv02509
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
TNT Hardwood Floors L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Interior Design Flooring Corporation
as 1:2011cv02510
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Interior Design Flooring Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Century-Maxim Construction Corp.
as 1:2011cv02429
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Century-Maxim Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Pyramid Associates Construction, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02427
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Pyramid Associates Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. DBS Woodworking, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02336
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
DBS Woodworking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Hi-Tech Bridging Inc.
as 1:2011cv02337
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Bridging Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Eastern Architectual Installers, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01938
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Eastern Architectual Installers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
