Cases 21 - 30 of 522
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HAKAMI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01854
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, JEDIDAH HUSSEY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and others
Plaintiff:
AHMED ABDULLAH A HAKAMI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LIU LAYER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01841
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Plaintiff:
SHANSHAN LIU LAYER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01832
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZHENG et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
RAN ZHENG, YIGE WANG, RAPHAEL WANG and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SWIDAN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01791
Defendant:
MATTHEW D. EMRICH, ARLINGTON ASYLUM OFFICE, ANTONIO DONIS and others
Plaintiff:
KARAM SWIDAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
