Cases 21 - 30 of 31
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al
as 03-1035
Petitioner:
AT&T Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al
as 03-1017
Petitioner:
AT&T Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Intervenor:
Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest, GTE Southwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Southwest and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
BellSouth Public Communications, Inc. and SBC Communications Inc.
Verizon Tele Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 01-1371
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Verizon California, Inc., Verizon Delaware, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
WorldCom Inc., Network Access Solutions, Inc., Sprint Corporation and others
Sprint Corp v. FCC, et al
as 01-1266
Petitioner:
Sprint Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation, Association of Communications Enterprises, BellSouth Public Communications, Inc. and others
WrldCom Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1218
Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Sprint Corporation, Association of Communications Enterprises, Competitive Telecommunications Association and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Terminated Party:
VoiceStream Wireless Corporation
Global Naps Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1192
Petitioner:
Global Naps, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
US Telecom Assn v. FCC, et al
as 01-1085
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
State of Iowa, Iowa Telecommunications and Technology Commission, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States and others
ACS Anchorage Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1059
Petitioner:
ACS of Anchorage, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
General Communication, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
Terminated Party:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States, GTE Midwest Incorporated, doing business as Verizon Midwest and others
Verizon Tele Cos, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1207
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies, Verizon Florida, Inc., Verizon North Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, GTE Florida Incorporated, GTE North Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Sprint Corporation and Kayson Communications, Inc.
Intervenor:
B.D.A. Sales, Inc., Just-Tel, Inc., Telebeam Telecommunications Corporation and others
Assn Comm Ent, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1144
Petitioner:
Association of Communications Enterprises
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Terminated Party:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, GTE Service Corporation, GTE Alaska Incorporated and others
Intervenor:
SBC Communications Inc., ICG Communications, Inc., Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
