Cases 21 - 30 of 347
Islam v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv08860
Respondent:
JOHN DOES 1-10 (names and number of whom are unknown at present), Texas Service Center, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Foyzul Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06862
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De La Cruz v. US Department of Justice, Executive Office of US Attorneys et al
as 1:2020cv09941
Plaintiff:
Sergio De La Cruz
Defendant:
Atty General William P. Barr, Executive Office of US Attorneys, Attorney General William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hossain v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05395
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
MD Anwar Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01419
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01444
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alam Niem v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05433
Respondent:
United States of Bureau of Consular Affairs, Jane Does 1-10, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Nazmul Alam Niem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
