Cases 31 - 40 of 457
Baker v. Barclays PLC et al
as 1:2023cv04881
Plaintiff:
Kenny Baker
Defendant:
Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank PLC, James E. Staley and others
Petitioner:
Richard Romano
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dunlea v. Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04043
Plaintiff:
Tim Dunlea
Defendant:
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Robert Cobuzzi, Jr., Jane H. Hollingsworth and others
O'Dell v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03957
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Wentworth Management Services, LLC v. Beckingham et al
as 1:2023cv02660
Plaintiff:
Wentworth Management Services, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Beckingham, June Beckingham, Keith L. Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Garage Employees Local 272 Labor Management Pension Fund v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01867
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Garage Employees Local 272 Labor Management Pension Fund
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Tim Cook, Art Levinson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dangerfield v. Duck Creek Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Tim Dangerfield
Defendant:
Duck Creek Technologies, Inc., Bill Bloom, Kathy Crusco and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
