Cases 31 - 38 of 38
National Association of Home B v. EPA
as 09-1327
Petitioner:
National Association of Home Builders
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., Conservation Law Foundation and Natural Resources Defense Council
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow, Chief and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
City of Newport News, Virginia
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow, Chief and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
City of Newport News, Virginia
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC. v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 1:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Lisa Perez Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
City of Newport News, Virginia
AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2008cv02198
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC., CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN L. JOHNSON and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DC Water and Sewer Authority v. Lisa Jackson
as 08-1251
Petitioner:
DC Water and Sewer Authority
Respondent:
Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, EPA, Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, EPA, Environmental Protection Agency and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., Friends of the Earth, Inc. and Sierra Club
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. EPA, et al
as 08-1180
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
John Campbell, United States Representative
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
