Cases filed in Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01517
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Firgueroa v. Credit Acceptance Financial Institution
as 1:2018cv22462
Plaintiff: Angel Rafael Cedeno Firgueroa
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Financial Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Mickles v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 0:2018cv60992
Plaintiff: Diane Mickles
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mortenson v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2018cv00297
Plaintiff: Andrew Mortenson
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Kang v. American Credit Acceptance, LLC
as 6:2018cv00640
Plaintiff: Christina Kang
Defendant: American Credit Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Figueroa v. Credit Acceptance et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv20480
Plaintiff: Angel Rafael Cedeno Figueroa
Defendant: Credit Acceptance and The World Used Cars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAY v. FLAGSHIP CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LLC
as 3:2017cv00908
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA GRAY
Defendant: FLAGSHIP CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gutierrez v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 8:2017cv02751
Plaintiff: Edward Gutierrez
Defendant: Credit Acceptance Corporation
Mediator: Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02614
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?