Cases 31 - 40 of 378
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Duke v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv22133
Plaintiff:
Mary Duke
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duke v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14976
Plaintiff:
Roger Duke
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duke v. Collins
as 8:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Duke
Defendant:
Brian E. Collins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
COLT DUKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pytynia v. United States, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01999
Plaintiff:
Janet-Monica Pytynia
Defendant:
United States, Inc., Duke Energy, Duke Energy Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25092
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CS Energy, LLC v. Doosan Gridtech EPC, LLC, et al
as 8:2022cv02288
Plaintiff:
CS ENERGY, LLC
Defendant:
DOOSAN GRIDTECH EPC, LLC, and DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Xaragua El v. Duke Energy Corporation
as 8:2022cv01998
Plaintiff:
Erod Habib Xaragua El
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14421
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE DUKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
