Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Chaparral Materials, Inc. v. HDR Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00550
Plaintiff:
Chaparral Materials, Inc.
Defendant:
HDR Enterprises, LLC, Christopher C. Hernandez, Shawn Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America for the use of HDR Enterprises, LLC et al v. MV Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00437
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of HDR Enterprises, LLC, United States of America for the use of Diversified Masonry Contractor, Rock Scapes of New Mexico, Inc. and others
Defendant:
MV Industries, Inc., Cochiti Community Development Corporation, Michael Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
San Juan Associates v. MerrillKnoll Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00316
Plaintiff:
San Juan Associates and San Juan Associates
Defendant:
MerrillKnoll Enterprises, LLC, Zack Merrill and Michael Knoll
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Vassar Enterprises, LLC v. Stewart Stevenson Power Products, LLC, et. al
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Vassar Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
In-N-Out Burgers v. Mr. Bill's In and Out Burgers et al
as 1:2007cv01249
Plaintiff:
In-N-Out Burgers, In-N-Out Burgers and In-N-Out Burgers
Defendant:
Mr. Bill's In and Out Burgers, LMB Enterprises, LLC, William Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
In-N-Out Burgers v. Mr. Bill's In and Out Burgers et al
as 2:2007cv01249
Plaintiff:
In-N-Out Burgers, In-N-Out Burgers and In-N-Out Burgers
Defendant:
Mr. Bill's In and Out Burgers, LMB Enterprises, LLC, William Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
McMichael et al v. Bohn et al
as 1:2007cv00534
Plaintiff:
Bill R. McMichael and Kimberly S. McMichael
Defendant:
Mark Bohn, Douglas J. McKinnon, Carl A. Steinbrenner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
