Cases 31 - 40 of 328
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. DBS Woodworking, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02336
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
DBS Woodworking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Hi-Tech Bridging Inc.
as 1:2011cv02337
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Bridging Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Eastern Architectual Installers, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01938
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Eastern Architectual Installers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Division Flooring Contracting Corp.
as 1:2011cv01942
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Division Flooring Contracting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. FTW Construction Corp.
as 1:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
FTW Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Atlas Concrete Construction Corp.
as 1:2011cv01899
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Atlas Concrete Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Proficient Builders Corp.
as 1:2011cv01898
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Proficient Builders Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Dunlop Mastclimbers Ltd.
as 1:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Dunlop Mastclimbers Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Promax Carpentry Inc.,
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Promax Carpentry Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. M&M Installations, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01314
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
M&M Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
