Cases filed in New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Amico et al v. Prosperity Bank et al
as 1:2009cv03788
Plaintiff: Philip T. Amico and Maria J. Amico
Defendant: Prosperity Bank, First American Title Insurance Company, First America Title Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract None
Prosperity Cement (Asia) Limited Macao Commercial Offshore v. Cementval S.L.
as 1:2009cv07311
Plaintiff: Prosperity Cement (Asia) Limited Macao Commercial Offshore, Prosperity Cement (Asia) Limited Macao Commercial Offshore and Prosperity Cement (Asia) Limited Macao Commercial Offshore
Defendant: Cementval S.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
Federal Insurance Company v. Expeditors International Ocean et al
as 1:2009cv04522
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company
Defendant: Expeditors International Ocean, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and M/V "Yang Ming Prosperity"
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 F.E.L.A.
Type: Contract None
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. v. EP Carriers Pte Ltd. et al
as 1:2009cv02411
Plaintiff: American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. and American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.
Defendant: EP Carriers Pte Ltd., APEX Ship Management Pte Ltd., ASP Ship Management Singapore Pte Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. v. EP Carriers Pte Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02411
Plaintiff: American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. and American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.
Defendant: EP Carriers Pte Ltd., APEX Ship Management Pte Ltd., ASP Ship Management Singapore Pte Ltd. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: APEX Ship Management Ltd., APEX Ship Management Ltd. and APEX Ship Management Pte Ltd.
ThirdParty Defendant: Arthur J. Gallagher (UK) Ltd. and Arthur J. Gallagher (UK) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. v. EP Carriers Pte Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv02411
Plaintiff: American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. and American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.
Defendant: EP Carriers Pte Ltd., APEX Ship Management Pte Ltd., ASP Ship Management Singapore Pte Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Type: Contract None
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. v. EP Carriers Pte Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv02411
Plaintiff: American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc. and American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.
Defendant: EP Carriers Pte Ltd., APEX Ship Management Pte Ltd., ASP Ship Management Singapore Pte Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
Elmaliach et al v. Bank of China Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02130
Plaintiff: Keren Elmaliach, Keren Elmaliach, Jan Elmaliach and others
Defendant: Bank of China Limited, Bank of China Limited and Bank of China Limited
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Textainer Equipment Management Limited v. EP Carriers Pte Ltd et al
as 1:2009cv00352
Plaintiff: Textainer Equipment Management Limited
Defendant: EP Carriers Pte Ltd and Golden Prosperity Enterprise Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
Havi Ocean Co. v. Prosperity One Navigation S.A.
as 1:2008cv11303
Plaintiff: Havi Ocean Co.
Defendant: Prosperity One Navigation S.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?