Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Valpak Dealers' Association, et al v. PRC
as 14-1065
Petitioner:
Valpak Dealers' Association, Inc. and Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
American Postal Workers Union, v. PRC
as 14-1035
Petitioner:
American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, et al v. PRC
as 14-1009
Petitioner:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
USPS v. PRC
as 14-1010
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Forest & Paper Association
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, American Catalog Mailers Association, Association for Postal Commerce and others
USPS v. PRC
as 13-1308
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
National Postal Policy Council, Association for Postal Commerce, Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc. and others
Julio Pabon, et al v. PRC
as 13-1247
Petitioner:
Julio Pabon and Steve Hutkins
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
USPS v. Postal Regulatory Commission
as 13-1229
Petitioner:
United States Postal Service
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers v. PRC, et al
as 13-1006
Petitioner:
Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Newspaper Assoc. of America v. Postal Regulatory Commission
as 12-1367
Petitioner:
Newspaper Association of America
Respondent:
Postal Regulatory Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
