Cases 31 - 36 of 36
CO Inter Gas Co v. FERC
as 97-1214
Petitioner:
Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
UGI Utilities, Inc., Amoco Production Company, Amoco Energy Trading Corporation and others
NE Engy Assoc, et al v. FERC
as 97-1140
Petitioner:
Northeast Energy Associates and North Jersey Energy Associates
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
UGI Utilities, Inc., South Carolina Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Company of North Carolina and others
:
and
NorAm Gas Transm v. FERC
as 97-1101
Petitioner:
NorAm Gas Transmission Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee, City of Springfield, Tennessee, City of Portland, Tennessee and others
:
UGI Util Inc, et al v. FERC
as 97-1035
Petitioner:
UGI Utilities, Inc., Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Columbia Gulf Transmission Company, Virginia Natural Gas, Inc. and others
PA Off Consum Advo v. FERC
as 93-1662
Petitioner:
Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Terminated Party:
New Jersey Natural Gas Company
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Carnegie Natural Gas Company and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Intervenor:
UGI Utilities, Inc.
Process Gas Consum, et al v. FERC
as 93-1405
Petitioner:
Process Gas Consumers Group and American Iron and Steel Institute
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
