Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Unite Here Local 1 v. Ritz-Carlton Water Tower Partnership
as 1:2012cv02948
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 1
Defendant:
Ritz-Carlton Water Tower Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Barker vs. Unite Hear Local 1
as 1:2011cv06043
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Barker
Defendant:
Unite Here Local 1
Movant:
Hyatt Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
NLRB v. Unite Here Local 1, et al
as 10-1357
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Unite Here Local 1 and Palmer House Hilton
Unite Here Local 1 v. NLRB
as 10-1342
Petitioner:
Unite Here Local 1
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. Palmer House Hilton, et al
as 10-3403
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
PALMER HOUSE HILTON and UNITE HERE LOCAL 1
520 South Michigan Avenue Associates, Ltd. v. Unite Here, Local 1
as 1:2010cv01422
Plaintiff:
520 South Michigan Avenue Associates, Ltd. and 520 South Michigan Avenue Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Unite Here, Local 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Unite Here Local 1 v. WWL DHotel Investors, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv07811
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 1
Defendant:
WWL DHotel Investors, LLC, Hilton Hotels Corporation and Vista International, (Illinois) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
UNITE HERE Local 1 v. Thor Equities, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv07363
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE Local 1
Defendant:
Thor Equities, LLC, Thor Palmer House Hotel & Shops, LLC, Thor Palmer House Hotel, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
NLRB v. Unite Here Local 1, et al
as 09-1123
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Unite Here Local 1 and Palmer House Hilton
Unite Here Local 1, et al v. NLRB
as 09-1106
Petitioner:
Unite Here Local 1 and Palmer House Hilton
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
