Cases 31 - 40 of 365
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-35352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING and IDAHO FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
American Wild Horse Campaign et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management Director et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Land Management Director, United States Department of Interior Secretary, Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Petitioner:
American Wild Horse Campaign, Animal Welfare Institute, Western Watershed Project and others
Intervenor:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Western Watersheds Project v. U.S. Forest Service
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Western Watersheds Project v. U.S. Forest Service
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Friends of the Inyo, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-15492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE INYO, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and LEEANN MURPHY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
KORE MINING, LTD.
Western Watersheds Project et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau Of Land Management, Jared Bybee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Burns Paiute Tribe, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15261
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE, RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Bartell Ranch LLC, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Plaintiff:
BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
