Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Banen and Yao
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as WHAM-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Adela Barnard, AKXIANGQIAOLIDIANPU12 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06802
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, aliqiang, XingHanQi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06739
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as WHAM-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, WeiMeiKe, Limen-Direct and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06252
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05672
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. and Intersport Corp d/b/a Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, (142) Ailytec Inc, Guangzhou Konglongyu Maoyi Youxian Gongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05009
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04980
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O and The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Defendant:
Beijing Hui Xin Zhi Xiang Shangmao Youxian Gongsi, Dongguan Jinxiuyunhuadianzishangwuyouxiangongsi, Dongguanshi Shoumo Dianzishangwu Youxiangongsi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04680
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as WHAM-O
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, HY-US Ltd, ELFREE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Wham-O Holding, Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04519
Plaintiff:
Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O and Intersport Corp. doing business as Wham-O Holding Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, PwrHe, ablechien and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
