Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INC et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv00823
Plaintiff: AURORA SINAI MEDICAL CENTER INC, JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL, LORETTO HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Contract None
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CCC HOLDINGS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02043
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and others
Defendant: CCC HOLDINGS INC., CCC HOLDINGS INC., CCC HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Other Statutes None
WARE v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01956
Plaintiff: DOROTHY WARE
Defendant: AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC and JEFF NADEL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MYERS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2008cv01793
Plaintiff: GLORIA MYERS
Defendant: RODNEY BYRD, IRVING MILLARD, DERON MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC et al v. LEVITT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01626
Plaintiff: COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE, LLC, FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL HEART INSTITUTE, LLC and others
Defendant: MICHAEL O. LEVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Contract None
BAMBA v. RESOURCE BANK et al
as 1:2008cv01163
Plaintiff: MAKOMI BAMBA
Defendant: RESOURCE BANK, COSMOPOLITAN SETTLEMENTS, AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property Both
POBLETE v. RITTENHOUSE MORTGAGE BROKERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00874
Plaintiff: L. IVAN POBLETE
Defendant: RITTENHOUSE MORTGAGE BROKERS, CLOSELINE, L.L.C., AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?