Cases 41 - 46 of 46
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02777
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Riley v. Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02707
Plaintiff:
Nancy Riley
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Varney v. Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02226
Plaintiff:
Dawn Varney, Dawn Varney and Dawn Varney
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kirkham v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Julie Kirkham, Julie Kirkham and Julie Kirkham
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mendoza v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00227
Plaintiff:
Helen Mendoza and Helen Mendoza
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Bhandari v. Bittner, et al
as 1:2003cv00012
Plaintiff:
Vijay S. Bhandari
Defendant:
Richard C. Bittner , Aventis Holdings Inc , Aventis, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Quintiles, Inc., Quintiles Transational Corp., Quintiles Laboratories Limited and others
Cross_defendant:
Quintiles, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Laboratory Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
