Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00704
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shelton v. Victoria Fire & Casualty Co Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01108
Plaintiff:
Suzanne N. Shelton
Defendant:
Victoria Fire & Casualty Co Inc and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothschild Mobile Imaging Innovations LLC v. Mitek Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00617
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Mobile Imaging Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Mitek Systems Inc. , JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
In re Chase Bank USA NA
as 1:2014mc00077
Movant:
Chase Bank USA NA
Respondent:
Timothy Lawrence
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00282
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Wright v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Errick M. Wright
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Alexis Eon, Diversified Consultants Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v. PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation Tbk et al
as 1:2013mc00143
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
PT Indah Kiat Pulp and Paper Corporation Tbk, PT Pabrick Kertas Tjiwi Kimia Tbk and Asia Pulp and Paper Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Cunningham v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cunningham
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
