Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Homosassa Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Homosassa Water District and Homosassa Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Tampa Bay Water v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 8:2007cv00516
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Plaintiff:
Tampa Bay Water and Tampa Bay Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
City of Inverness Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
City of Inverness Water District and City of Inverness Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Wendt, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 6:2001cv00680
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ona Wendt, Dawn Ackerman, Harold Ackerman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Ellenburg, et al v. Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00153
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ditmar Wendt, Connie Dickinson, Alma Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Moye, et al v. The Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00155
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Upaco Adhesives, Inc., Elf-Atofina North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Moye, Luisa Alvarez, Cher Curtis and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
