Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Brandom et al v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv10645
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brandom and Cara Brandom
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Parsons v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10067
Plaintiff:
Lyman Parsons
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimes v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv09663
Plaintiff:
Gary Grimes
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company and Lilly USA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pladna v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv09681
Plaintiff:
David Pladna
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, AbbVie Products LLC, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv09655
Plaintiff:
Richard Powell
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv09668
Plaintiff:
Nelda Lois Barton
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv09631
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company and Lilly USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Constant v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv08847
Plaintiff:
Randy Constant
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mason et al v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2015cv07460
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mason and Lynn Mason
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA Inc., Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv07347
Plaintiff:
Franklin Freeman
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Labratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
