Cases 41 - 50 of 387
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Foran v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Mark Foran
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saee v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10462
Plaintiff:
Ali Saee
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alf Poor and others
MacMillan v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10265
Plaintiff:
Aiden MacMillan
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc., Shane McMahon, Alfred Poor and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ali Saee
Consolidated Defendant:
Jim Cassano, VIA Motors International, Inc. and Longboard Merger Sub, Inc.
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06658
Plaintiff:
Sai E Zhuang
Defendant:
Lucky Nail Spa, Inc., Jian Jian Han and Ronggai Yang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa Inc. et. al.
as 2:2021cv06658
Plaintiff:
Sai E Zhuang
Defendant:
Lucky Nail Spa, Inc., Jian Jian Han and Ronggai Yang
Counter Claimant:
Lucky Nail Spa Inc. and Han Jian Jian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shi et al v. Ajisai Japanese Fusion, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09340
Plaintiff:
Jian Shi, Xin Yu Li, Hong Tao Chen and others
Defendant:
Ajisai Japanese Fusion, Inc., Hane Japanese Fusion, Inc., Yao Yao Sushi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
