Cases filed in Hawaii
Cases 41 - 50 of 85
United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. et al v. David Boland, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00487
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc, United States of America for the use and benefit of Salinas Construction, Inc. and Salinas Construction, Inc.
Defendant: David Boland, Inc, JT Construction Enterprises Corporation, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. v. RWT L.L.C.
as 1:2016cv00442
Defendant: RWT L.L.C., John Does 1-20, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-20 and others
Plaintiff: Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. and Arekat Pacific Security, Inc. United States of America for the use and benefit of Arekate Pacific Security, Inc. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as API Security
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Oshiro v. Tate Andale, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00308
Plaintiff: Barbara Jean Oshiro and Joann Roth
Defendant: Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc. , Cummins, Inc. , Flowserve US Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Cummins, Inc. and Ingersoll Rand Co.
Cross_defendant: Ametek, Inc., CBS Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Feliciano v. Crane Company
as 1:2016cv00212
Defendant: Crane Company , Flowserve US Inc. , Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Rodney A. Feliciano and Beatrice L. Feliciano
Cross_claimant: Ametek, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Company , Does 1 to 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Kingston Environmental Services, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of v. David Boland, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00205
Defendant: David Boland, Inc., Western Surety Company, Granite Precasting & Concrete, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Kingston Environmental Services, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of and Kingston Environmental Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Berkely Regional Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Pagan, Sr. v. Crane Co.
as 1:2016cv00135
Defendant: Crane Co. , Flowserve US Inc. , Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Alexander Pagan, Sr.
Cross_claimant: Crane Co.
Cross_defendant: Crane Co. , Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Does 1 to 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America for use and benefit of KH Electric, Inc. et al v. Environet, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff: United States of America for use and benefit of KH Electric, Inc. and KH Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Environet, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Wasserfort v. Crane Company; et al.
as 1:2015cv00493
Plaintiff: Larry D. Wasserfort and Joan Wasserfort
Defendant: Crane Company , Flowserve US Inc. , Clark-Reliance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Almeida v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00323
Plaintiff: Gary Almeida
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Flowserve US Inc. , Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Cummins, Inc. , Ingersoll Rand Co. , Gould Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Cummins, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. v. DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and as assignee of the United States of America for the use and benefit of Big Island Electric, Inc. , Bergelectric Corp. and Big Island Electric, Inc.
Defendant: DCK-ECC Pacific, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?