Cases 41 - 50 of 407
Hanover Foods Corporation v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv04842
Plaintiff:
Hanover Foods Corporation
Defendant:
Axis Surplus Insurance Company, Everest Indemnity Insurance Company, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
BRIDGEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY and FIDELIS UNDERWRITING LIMITED, LIRMA F0012
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 in Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Nirmal, L.C. d/b/a Super 8 Motel at Houston Nasa/Webster v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
Nirmal, L.C. d/b/a Super 8 Motel at Houston Nasa/Webster
Defendant:
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nirmal, LLC v. Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 Lloyds et al
as 2:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
Nirmal, LLC doing business as Super 8 Motel at Houston Nasa/Webster
Defendant:
Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 Lloyds and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ortega et al v. Trident Restoration, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortega and Jorge Navarro
Defendant:
Trident Restoration, Inc., Tri Contracting, Inc., Ukrop, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Endurance Specialty Insurance Limited v. Horseshoe Re Limited
as 1:2023cv01831
Petitioner:
Endurance Specialty Insurance Limited
Respondent:
Horseshoe Re Limited
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 205 Removal from State Court: Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards
James Kilkenny and Charles Priolo as Trustees of the Construction Council Local 175 Pension Fund et al v. Re-Earth of Stroudsburg, Inc.
as 7:2022cv10877
Plaintiff:
James Kilkenny and Charles Priolo as Trustees of the Construction Council Local 175 Pension Fund, James Kilkenny and Charles Priolo as Trustees of the Construction Council Local 175 Welfare Fund, James Kilkenny and Charles Priolo as Trustees of the Construction Council Local 175 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Re-Earth of Stroudsburg, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
CBKZZ Investment LLC v. Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 LLoyds et al
as 1:2022cv10672
Plaintiff:
CBKZZ INVESTMENT LLC and CBKZZ Investment LLC doing business as Casa Rosa Hotel
Defendant:
RENAISSANCE RE SYNDICATE 1468 LLOYD'S, MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY and Renaissance Re Syndicate 1458 LLoyds
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2022md03044
In Re:
In Re: Exactech Polyethylene Orthopedic Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mark Goldman, Lawrence Daly, Alexander Berger and others
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc., TPG Capital and others
Interested Party:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and Brown Greer, LLC
Petitioner:
Cynthia Veneziano, Joseph Mackin, Deborah Mackin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant:
One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant:
Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
