Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Barry Donnellan v. Moonstone, LLC
as 22-35924
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
MOONSTONE, LLC
Barry Donnellan v. West Valley Vision Center, Inc.
as 22-35914
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST VALLEY VISION CENTER, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Aurora Animal Care (clinic), Inc.
as 22-35926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA ANIMAL CARE (CLINIC), INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Cafe De Paris Catering Company
as 22-35915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
CAFE DE PARIS CATERING COMPANY
Barry Donnellan v. Groundhogs, LLC
as 22-35919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
GROUNDHOGS, LLC
Barry Donnellan v. Jeska-Alaska, Inc.
as 22-35925
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
JESKA-ALASKA, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Todd Wentz
as 22-35917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD Z. WENTZ, D.D.S., M.S., P.C.
Barry Donnellan v. Shane D. Rhoton, LLC
as 22-35923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE D. RHOTON, LLC
Barry Donnellan v. Northern Lights Business, Inc.
as 22-35916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHERN LIGHTS BUSINESS, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Pete B. Higgins DDS, LLC
as 22-35904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee:
PETE B. HIGGINS DDS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
