Cases 51 - 60 of 399
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhu et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2022cv05458
Plaintiff:
Ying Zhu and M & Y Transportation LLC
Defendant:
Mi Shen Goldberg, Max Z Goldberg and Coronet Ceramics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ZHU et al v. GOLDBERG et al
as 1:2022cv05457
Plaintiff:
YING ZHU and MAX Z GOLDBERG
Defendant:
MI SHEN GOLDBERG and CORONET CERAMICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wen et al v. New York City Regional Center, LLC
as 1:2022cv07383
Plaintiff:
WEN BAI, XIAOLING CAO, YAN CAO and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY REGIONAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
