Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Miller et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff: Mary Miller and Gene Miller
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindberg et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01179
Plaintiff: Patricia Lindberg and Carl Lindberg
Defendant: Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wroble et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01684
Plaintiff: Julie Wroble and Jerry Wroble
Defendant: Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worrell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff: Doreen Worrell
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv09713
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huff v. Ethicon, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00368
Plaintiff: Matthew Huff
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03314
Plaintiff: Eddie Lee Jackson
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcotte v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 1:2015cv11553
Plaintiff: Dianna Marcotte
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sankowski et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07907
Plaintiff: Nicole Sankowski and Michael Sankowski
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07249
Plaintiff: Deborah Martin
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?