Cases 61 - 70 of 35,247
Starbucks Corporation v. NLRB
as 24-1123
Petitioner:
Starbucks Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
National Mining Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1124
Petitioner:
National Mining Association and America's Power
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1125
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WP COMPANY LLC v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Chelmowski v. United States Environment Protection Agency, The
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHELMOWSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JAVED v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00623
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SANTIAGO RAMIREZ v. UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
