Cases
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Cohen v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10344
Plaintiff: Sam Cohen and Sam Cohen
Defendant: Citigroup, Inc., Charles Prince, Robert E. Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Nathanson v. Prince et al
as 1:2007cv10333
Plaintiff: Benjamin Nathanson
Defendant: Charles Prince, Robert E. Rubin, Winfried Bischoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cinotto v. Prince et al
as 1:2007cv09900
Plaintiff: Gary Cinotto
Defendant: Charles Prince, Michael C. Armstrong, Alain J.P. Belda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Harris v. Prince et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv09841
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Harris
Defendant: Charles Prince, Robert E. Rubin, Winfried Bishcoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Frederic Malek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-7108
Plaintiff - Appellant: Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association, Wayne County Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Housing Finance Agency, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant - Appellee: Franklin D. Raines, Timothy Howard, Daniel H. Mudd and others
MIDDLETON v. RAINES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01221
Plaintiff: ARTHUR MIDDLETON
Defendant: FRANKLIN D. RAINES, J. TIMOTHY HOWARD, DANIEL H. MUDD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
KELLMER v. RAINES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01173
Plaintiff: JAMES KELLMER
Defendant: FRANKLIN D. RAINES, J. TIMOTHY HOWARD, LEANNE SPENCER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?