Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Haller v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10881
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sandra Haller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv07254
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hooper
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arbit v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00057
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. , C.R. Bard, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Janette Arbit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Magana et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02047
Plaintiff:
Javier Magana and Julie Magana
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Szczepanik v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Szczepanik
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bryant v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01311
Plaintiff:
Charla Bryant
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estes v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07170
Plaintiff:
Felton Estes and Victoria Estes
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
World Wide Medical Tech LLC, et al v. C R Bard Inc.
as 1:2012cv04851
Plaintiff:
World Wide Medical Technologies LLC , Advanced Care Medical Inc. and Brachysciences, Inc.
Defendant:
C R Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Zink et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 3:2012cv50083
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debra Zink and David Zink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2008cv02142
Plaintiff:
Sherry Hill
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, C R Bard Inc, Davol Inc and others
Respondent:
Adolf Lo and Sidney Rohrscheib
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
