Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Sirk v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Michael Sirk
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC and Law Office of Thomas Landis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv80276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garcia v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 1:2009cv21659
Plaintiff:
Amado Garcia and Amado Garcia
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Claussen v. Law Offices of Andreu, Palma & Palma, P.L. et al
as 0:2009cv60615
Plaintiff:
Scott Claussen
Defendant:
Law Offices of Andreu, Palma & Palma, P.L. and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv21110
Plaintiff:
Pedro Pablo Pena
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Transunion, LLC., AFNI, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sands V. Wagner & Hunt, P.A. ,et al
as 0:2009cv60557
Plaintiff:
Thao N. Sands
Defendant:
Wagner & Hunt, P.A. and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv14098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reyes v. Cavalry Portfolio Services,LLC et al
as 1:2008cv23484
Plaintiff:
Martha J. Reyes and Martha J. Reyes
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services,LLC and Wagner & Hunt,P.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Acosta v. Wagner & Hunt, P.A. et al
as 0:2008cv61669
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Acosta
Defendant:
Wagner & Hunt, P.A. and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
