Cases 61 - 70 of 4,495
Woods v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03439
Plaintiff:
Edwina A. Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Riley-Henderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03442
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn L. Riley-Henderson
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reun v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Nhanh Kathy Reun
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Karlo v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01797
Plaintiff:
Rita Karlo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wagner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03353
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Wagner
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clemans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Clemans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Zargorski v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Lea Marie Zargorski
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Judy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
David Judy
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yerk v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50089
Plaintiff:
Alexa M. Yerk
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
