Cases 61 - 70 of 103
CHANEL, INC. v. ADAMS DANIELLE et al
as 0:2017cv61127
Plaintiff:
CHANEL, INC.
Defendant:
ADAMS DANIELLE, AIN ROA, Alana Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Liu v. Director, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services et al
as 6:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Heding Liu
Defendant:
Director, U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Texas Service Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chanel, Inc. v. 726usjsIS et al
as 0:2017cv60715
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
726usjsIS, Amparo Doyle CO LTD, ANGELA PASECHA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Liu v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2017cv20639
Plaintiff:
Leonita Liu
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Zhang et al v. Raymond James & Associates Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv24655
Plaintiff:
Zheng Zhang , Haiyun Hu , Lixia Wang and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates Inc., , Joel Burstein and Ariel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chanel, Inc. v. BethBass et al
as 0:2016cv61674
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
BethBass, CasesPRO, CroftHumphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Fendi Adele, S.r.l. v. ALEXANDER OTT et al
as 0:2016cv60618
Plaintiff:
Fendi Adele, S.r.l.
Defendant:
ALEXANDER OTT, Amanda Presley, Amaz0n Fashion classic case shop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. sea hero et al
as 0:2016cv60338
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
sea hero, Adrian Steven, BerryArt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Liu
as 8:2016cv00292
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mandy Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
