Cases 61 - 64 of 64
NextWave Prsnal Comm, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1402
Petitioner:
NextWave Personal Communications Inc. and NextWave Power Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Cellular Corporation, Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and others
Intervenor:
Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, VoiceStream Wireless Corporation, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Nextel Communications, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Kenneth N. Klee, Robert E. Torricelli, Senator, Charles E. Schumer, Senator and others
US Telecom Assn, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1012
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc., Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation, Covad Communications Company, Network Access Solutions Corp. and others
Terminated Party:
US WEST Communications, Inc., NorthPoint Communications, Inc., MCI WorldCom, Inc. and others
:
Fresno Mobile Radio, et al v. FCC, et al
as 97-1459
Petitioner:
Fresno Mobile Radio, Inc., Johnson Repeater Company, JSM Communications, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Nextel Communications, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Airtouch Paging, Communications Enterprises, Inc., PowerPage, Inc. and others
Cassell, James A., et al v. FCC
as 97-1005
Appellant - Appellant:
James A. Cassell and Kelley Communications, Inc.
:
United States of America
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Potomac Corporation, doing business as Crescent Communications
Intervenor:
Nextel Communications, Inc. and Personal Communications Industry Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
