Cases 61 - 68 of 68
Straussner v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Donald Straussner, Donald Straussner and Donald Straussner
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, ABB Inc, Allied Signal, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fulks v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Logan Fulks, Logan Fulks and Logan Fulks
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc, A W Chesterton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ward v. Riley Stoker Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ward, Daniel Ward and Daniel Ward
Defendant:
Riley Stoker Corporation, Union Carbide, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lacey v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Linda Lacey, Linda Lacey, Linda Lacey and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc, American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Shotts v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2007cv00605
Plaintiff:
Lulu Irene Shotts
Defendant:
General Electric Company, AGA Gas, Inc., Allied Crane, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vandegraft v. Pneumo Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01144
Plaintiff:
Dora Vandegraft
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corporation, Pneumo Abex LLC, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Nussbaum et al v. Pneumo Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alan Nussbaum and Roxy Nussbaum
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corporation, Pneumo Abex Corporation, Pneumo Abex LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Durbin v. Peumo Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01037
Plaintiff:
Carol Durbin
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corporation, Pneumo Abex Corporation, Pneumo Abex LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
