Cases 61 - 70 of 86
Johnson v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06754
Plaintiff:
Renita Johnson
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
Mary Renee Chase
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Traylor v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv05651
Plaintiff:
Linda Traylor
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pistone v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv04028
Plaintiff:
Christine Pistone
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spann v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv03038
Plaintiff:
Erma Spann
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 1:2015cv10095
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Maxwell
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuduj v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Tom Tuduj
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Unknown Parties and GlaxoSmithKline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanofi et al v. Alkem Laboratories, Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv01957
Plaintiff:
Sanofi and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Defendant:
Alkem Laboratories, Ltd. and Ascend Laboratories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Elorac, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.
as 1:2014cv01859
Plaintiff:
Elorac, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanofi et al v. Sun Pharma Global FZE et al
as 1:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
Sanofi and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Defendant:
Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
