Cases 61 - 70 of 230
Hales v. Sun Industries, LLC et al
as 0:2021cv61048
Defendant:
Sun Industries, LLC and Toby Berthelot
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hales, Hector Detres, Arthur Cabezas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Hales v. Sun Industries, LLC et al
as 0:2021cv61043
Defendant:
Sun Industries, LLC and Toby Berthelot
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hales
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18359
Plaintiff:
TOBY JOHN ADAMS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY LYLE STOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01175
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIZE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19549
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY MIZE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15812
Plaintiff:
TOBY COOPER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14887
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY-JOHN WILLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOBY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09761
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TAKISHA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05347
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
