Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 181,222
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
Leiva Castro, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3761
Petitioner: FLOR MARINA LEIVA CASTRO, ASHLY GISSEL REYES LEIVA, CRISTIAN JOSUE REYES LEIVA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pereira, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3762
Petitioner: CLOVIS VAZ PEREIRA, ALINE DOS SANTOS MOROVA VAZ, NOEMI VAZ DOS SANTOS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera-Trigueros v. Garland
as 24-3764
Petitioner: DENNIS ORLANDO RIVERA-TRIGUEROS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cordova Carballo v. Garland
as 24-3766
Petitioner: SANDOR CORDOVA CARBALLO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fernandez Quispe, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3769
Petitioner: YOR YELSIN FERNANDEZ QUISPE and ALIANA YAMILETH FERNANDEZ ALARCON
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stockton, et al. v. Ferguson, et al.
as 24-3777
Plaintiff: JOHN STOCKTON, RICHARD EGGLESTON, MD, THOMAS T. SILER, MD and others
Defendant: ROBERT FERGUSON, Attorney General of the State of Washington and KYLE S. KARINEN, Executive Director of the Washington Medical Commission
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-3781
Petitioner: LUIS EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lozoya-Ruiz v. Garland
as 24-3773
Petitioner: OSCAR LOZOYA-RUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Reyes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3792
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER EMMANUEL GARCIA REYES, CLARA LUZ MANCILLA HERRERA and CHRISTOPHER LEONADO GARCIA MANCILLA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?