Cases 71 - 80 of 196
Holt et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03670
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Holt and Patricia Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03505
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Scott and Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Candelo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03482
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Damaris Candelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Townsend v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03480
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Esther Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gochenouer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03481
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gochenouer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Samuels v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03483
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barber et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03484
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Barber and Michael Barber
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiseman v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03106
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Don Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Philbrick et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02928
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aurora Philbrick and David Philbrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Escobar et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02813
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Debra Escobar and Juan Escobar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
