Cases 71 - 80 of 346
HAZRATIASHTIANI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
MOJGAN HAZRATIASHTIANI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER and SCOTT M. OUDKIRK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HANNA v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
SAMER AHMED HANNA
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, YAEL LEMPERT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SEDAGHATDOUST v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03218
Plaintiff:
ALIREZA SEDAGHATDOUST
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SEAN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MEARAJ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
SADAF MEARAJ
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JOY M. SAKURAI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
