Cases 71 - 80 of 222
Righthaven LLC v. Arpajian
as 2:2010cv01764
Defendant:
Scott Arpajian
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Building Association et al
as 2:2010cv01765
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Building Association and Walt Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. The Second Amendment Foundation et al
as 2:2010cv01771
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Defendant:
Keeva Segal and The Second Amendment Foundation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Howells et al
as 2:2010cv01735
Defendant:
Ian Howells and Mr News Breaker
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Hyatt
as 2:2010cv01736
Defendant:
Bill Hyatt
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01683
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Defendant:
Jim Snyder, Philip Van Cleave and Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Joe
as 2:2010cv01684
Defendant:
Don W. Joe
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. Scott
as 2:2010cv01685
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Defendant:
Larry Scott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. NEVEU et al
as 2:2010cv01674
Defendant:
CLIMATE CHANGE FRAUD, THOMAS NEVEU and THOMAS RICHARD
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Righthaven LLC v. AR15.COM, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01671
Defendant:
AR15.COM, LLC, EDWARD AVILA and JUAN AVILA
Plaintiff:
Righthaven LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
