Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv22174
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv22175
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Kerruish et al v. Essex Holdings, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60877
Plaintiff:
Catherine Kerruish and Barbara Cressman
Defendant:
Essex Holdings, Inc. , Navin Xavier , Ricardo O Alberty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMarco v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 9:2016cv80442
Plaintiff:
Franklyn P. DeMarco, Jr.
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seroski et al v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 6:2015cv01899
Plaintiff:
Ronald Seroski and Diana Seroski
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
FMT, FZE v. KODASCO International, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv23103
Plaintiff:
FMT, FZE
Defendant:
KODASCO International, LLC and Steve Hong
Garnishee:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Yonge et al v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 3:2015cv00475
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Yonge and Vanda Yonge
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD Bank, N.A. v. HR Global Investment, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21285
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
HR Global Investment, Inc., Union Savings Bank, Cooperative Practices Del Canal/1/Corp. Serv. Multiples Coopra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Smith v. Critelli's Auto Mart, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Tay Smith
Defendant:
Critelli's Auto Mart, LLC, Nicholas C. Critelli, Amscot Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Robinson v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 0:2015cv60469
Plaintiff:
Kendall Robinson
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
