Cases 71 - 80 of 91
TALAGA v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv02159
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS P. TALAGA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
JAEGER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01409
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. JAEGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
DOWELL v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01390
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. DOWELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
GUNNINK et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2007cv01292
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GUNNINK and JANET GUNNINK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
DILL v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01100
Plaintiff:
COLBY F. DILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
GLASS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01077
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR M. GLASS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2007cv01059
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACKSON STEPHENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, T. E. FENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
THRASHER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01015
Plaintiff:
JACK D. THRASHER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
DUPUY v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
BURTON DUPUY and YVONNE DUPUY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 Civil Actions by Taxpayers for Refund of Taxes
NORTH v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv00781
Plaintiff:
GRANT NORTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
