Cases 71 - 80 of 198
Young Living Essential Oils v. Abundant Health
as 2:2016cv01111
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Abundant Health
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prometheus Development et al v. Young
as 2:2016cv01010
Plaintiff:
Prometheus Development and Jake White
Defendant:
Trisha Young
Thirdparty_defendant:
King & McCleary and Matthew O. McCleary
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Trisha Young
Counter_claimant:
Trisha Young
Counter_defendant:
Prometheus Development and Jake White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00844
Plaintiff:
Boyd R. Young
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Young Living Essential Oils v. Natural Essentials
as 2:2016cv00635
Defendant:
Natural Essentials
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Young Living Essential Oils v. Essential Tools, The
as 2:2016cv00636
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Essential Tools, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Young Living Essential Oils v. Ovvio International
as 2:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Ovvio International
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Young Living Essential Oils v. Nature's Truth
as 2:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Nature's Truth
Counter_claimant:
Nature's Truth
Counter_defendant:
Young Living Essential Oils
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
USA v. Wade et al
as 2:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stanley L. Wade, Janet B. Wade, Cherry Hills UBO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Young Living Essential Oils v. Piping Rock Health Products
as 2:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Piping Rock Health Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
