Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 216
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01344
Defendant: U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01333
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE, SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEOPOLD et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv00957
Plaintiff: JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED INC.
Defendant: DOJ OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOJ DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ted Lieu, et al v. FEC
as 19-5072
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Wager, Zephyr Teachout, Ted Lieu, Representative and others
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Election Commission
Plaintiff / Appellee: Walter Jones, Representative
Amicus Curiae: Christopher T. Robertson, D. Alex Winkelman, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and others
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00810
Plaintiff: ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOJ OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOJ DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner: DAVID ANDREW CHRISTENSON
Amicus Curiae: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
David Codrea, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-5044
Defendant / Appellee: William P. Barr, in his official as Attorney General and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Plaintiff / Appellant: Scott Heuman, Owen Monroe and David Codrea
Amicus Curiae: Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
Damien Guedes, et al v. ATF, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5042
Plaintiff / Appellee: Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., CA 18-3083
Plaintiff / Appellant: Florida Carry, Inc., Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas E. Brandon, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
Firearms Policy Coalition, In, et al v. ATF, et al
as 19-5043
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas E. Brandon, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Damien Guedes, Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., CA 18-3083
Amicus Curiae: Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2019cv00398
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03022
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?