Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vida Skin Care, Inc., et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., et al
as 22-55540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIDA SKIN CARE, INC., a California corporation, SARINE MARIE, INC., a California corporation, DEIRMENJIAN DENTAL GROUP, INC., DBA Desert Dental Group and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., a Connecticut corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Joaquim Finato v. Keith Fink and Associates, et al
as 18-55044
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
JOAQUIM FINATO
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH ALLEN FINK and SARAH HERNANDEZ
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
KEITH FINK AND ASSOCIATES
Metropolitan Property and Casu v. Sarah Hedlund, et al
as 16-17102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH MARIE HEDLUND, SCOTT MAGNUSON and DANIEL SAH
Dongbu Insurance Company, Ltd. v. David Watson, et al
as 16-16511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONGBU INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., a foreign corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID L. WATSON and SARAH S. WATSON
Steven Waltner, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 11-35726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN T WALTNER and SARAH V WALTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank FA and DOES, 1-1000, inclusive
Sarah West, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 11-35701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH WEST, AUSRA WEST and JAMES WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES A, B, AND C
Jason Campbell, et al v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP
as 09-16370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JASON CAMPBELL and SARAH SOBEK
Defendant - Appellant:
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP
Amicus Curiae:
EMPLOYERS GROUP, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT LAW COUNCIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
