Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Hopkins v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01972
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Michael J. Renna and others
Stein v. South Jersey Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
South Jersey Industries, Inc., Joseph M. Rigby, Sarah M. Barpoulis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01940
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rosenberg v. Berman & Rabin, P.A. et al
as 1:2021cv06812
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rosenberg
Defendant:
Berman & Rabin, P.A. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Habib v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv08786
Plaintiff:
Mark Habib
Defendant:
David R. Mitchell, Luis Ignacio Solorzano Aizpuru, Kimberly H. Sheehy and others
Nominal Defendant:
CarLotz, Inc.
In Re Carlotz, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv08623
Plaintiff:
Julian Cha
Defendant:
David R. Mitchell, Luis Ignacio Solorzano Aizpuru, Kimberly H. Sheehy and others
Nominal Defendant:
CarLotz, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
